When Equal doesn’t really mean Equal…

Posted: November 21, 2008 in Celebrating Diversity, Free Speech, LIEberals, Politics, Utter Inshanity!

Or in the words of that great and under-appreciated philosopher and sophist Innigo Montoya, “I do not think that word means what you think that it means.”

I found this over at Marginalized Action Dinosaur, as part of the Candadian Charter of Human Rights:

 15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability. 

(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

So, in essence, everyone is to be treated equally under the law, except of course, those people who are given special benefits and priviledges because of their status as an aggrieved minority group.  They are to treated a little, you know, more equally than everyone else.

And apparently, bitching about this kind of “enhanced equality” is considered discrimination or a hate crime, so just sort of shut up and love it…or else.

In other words, you can’t be discriminated AGAINST on the basis of sex, color, religion, etc., but you can most certainly be discriminated FOR based on these very same traits.

The fact that this implicity discriminates against everyone else who isn’t given the same special dispensation seems to sort of rather escape the brilliant progressive minds that come up with this sort of stuff.

Advertisements
Comments
  1. dinosaur says:

    good post tattered bits of Mohammed!

    I would like the charter a lot more without section 15.2 which essentially means anything done to whites or males or Christians is ok.

    but it’s not like anyone voted for it. It was never a topic in a federal election, So it’s a great piece of undemocracy.

  2. Steve B says:

    I have to say, i am especially font of the “Tattered Bits of Mohammed.” There’s a certain delightful visual imagery that goes with that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s