Next Time, Don’t Elect A Black Man!

Posted: August 15, 2013 in ACLU, Celebrating Diversity, Election 2008, Government, LIEberals, Obama, Obamania, Political Correctness, Politics, Racism

WHAT!?!  HOW CAN YOU SAY SUCH A THING!???!  RACIST!!  HATER!!!1!1!

Wait.  It get’s better.  DON’T ELECT A WHITE MAN EITHER!  Don’t elect a woman.  Don’t elect a hispanic, or a lesbian, or Jew.  Don’t elect a Mormon or a Christian or a Buddhist.

Next time…Elect. A. PRESIDENT.

The criteria used to select the qualifications of those who serve in the highest offices of our lands, of those who will help frame and craft our laws, who we elect to guide the country forward and make the difficult decisions required of leaders in this day and age should have NOTHING to do with their skin color, their gender, their religion or their “cultural heritage.”

ObamaHalo2I propose that we are in the mess we are in right now because we elected a black man. Not because Barack Obama is black, but because we as a voting populace became so enamored of the idea of electing an African-American as President, became soooo fixated on the sense of accomplishment we could collectively feel at breaking through this cultural barrier into a new, undiscovered “enlightenment” that we allowed ourselves to be swayed.  We turned a blind eye to what should have been some very real concerns about this individual’s (lack of) qualifications, experiences, questionable associations and storied background, and allowed ourselves to be swept along on a carefully manipulated wave of euphoric idealism.

And so we elected a black man.  Because it made us feel good to do it.  Not because he was in any way the most qualified, not because he had any demonstrated talent or ability for the position, not because he would best be able to represent the interests of the United States on the global stage…but because he was an icon we wanted.  More than anything, I think voting for Barack Obama became a sort of social statement about our ability to somehow atone for a shameful past. {Cue Music: “We are marching to Pre-torrrria….}

There aren’t enough of any one particular minority demographic in the United States to elect a President.  Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Amerian Indians, Asians, young, old, rich, poor…we aaaalll had to play a part.  It became part of a collective social consciousness.  For some it was a chance to speak out, to elect someone they hoped would “represent their interests” better than an establishment white guy might.  For some it was, I think, a chance to show how enlightened, how tolerant, how progressive they were in bucking the existing paradigm.  Many perhaps voted for Barack Obama out of some vague sense of racial or social guilt which they felt might be assuaged or expunged if they participated in this great social awakening.  Of course, many just bought into the class warfare schtick he was selling and wanted the free stuff he was offering.

NONE of which is a very solid foundation for picking a candidate for the office of the President of the United States.

Don’t get me wrong.  I’ve got absolutely no problem with either the idea or the practical reality of someone who is black becoming president.  You put a Herman Cain, Clarence Thomas or an Alan West or maybe even a a Condolleza Rice in there and hey, they’ve got my vote.  Why?  Because I like their politics.  Their personal philosophy resonates with me. I can look at a record of accomplishments which suggest to me a level of overall professional competence which grants me a sense of confidence in their ability to handle the demands of the position.

Not because of, or in spite of their skin color.  Or their gender.  Or their religious beliefs.  Because I think they are the most qualified, and so that other stuff SHOULDN’T MATTER. Right?  Isn’t that what true equality is really all about?  Shouldn’t THAT be considered the truly “enlightened” approach?

So, I hope we’ve learned our lesson.  As we sit mired in double digit unemployment, as our national debt continues to skyrocket, after six years with no signed federal budget and a sequestration which imposes daily pain on the infrastructure of this nation while the President golfs and vacations, I hope our euphoria has faded.  I hope our guilt-motivated idealism has moderated a bit.  I hope that when the times comes again, whether on the local or national stage, we don’t elect a black man, or a white man, or a woman, or a {fill in the blank}.

I hope we wise up and elect the people MOST QUALIFIED to lead this country, regardless of how their chormosomes are configured.

Comments
  1. jonolan says:

    You’re a racist. You put the content of someone’s character above the color their skin and that’s racist! Or so the “Black Community” and the Liberals will claim and so the MSM would as well if you achieved fame.

    You’re not allowed to judge a Black by any criteria other than its “Blackness” and you must make sure that you judge them favorably for being un-American and as Oreos, Uncle Toms, or Sell-Outs for emotionally and spiritually immigrating to America.

  2. Steve B says:

    I despise the oft-quoted dictate that a black politician who fails to hold the “correct” (read: libera/progressive) viewpoint has somehow sold-out to the white establishment, or some other such rot. The term “Uncle Tom” — as deeply a racist and offensive term to me as “nigger” — is almost exclusively used to denigrate blacks who don’t “act right,” who don’t conform to the mandates of the cultural expectations they are supposed to inherit and champion because of their skin color; and is used almost exclusively by the LEFT, who want to shame or otherwise marginalize these traitors to their racial heritage. Or something.

    Can anyone really say that Barack H. Obama was the most techically and experientially QUALIFIED person to hit that debate stage during either election? Was Barack Obama more qualified than Mitt Romney to address the economic woes of this country? Hell no. But, B.O. would “heal us,” he would unite us, he would {{again, fill in the blank}}. We bought the bill of goods, were suckered in by the carnival barker’s loud and insistent promises of something AMAZING! I guess my question is, after almost six years….

    “How’s that working out for you?!”

  3. Candy Rant says:

    YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!! To every word you wrote.

  4. Most excellent post.
    Expect an audit soon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s